• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • •
3.02.2008
Exhibit 7.15
By
Anonymous
|
0
comments
3.01.2008
Exhibit 7.14
Transactions
Company Dodgeball Team - Adam Peterson placed on 60-day disabled list with rotator cuff injury. RH Tony Nunez recalled.
By
Anonymous
|
0
comments
Cross-reference: Placements& Sports& Transactions
2.28.2008
Exhibit 7.13
For some reason, employees at the company where I work are walking over to a gym to play dodgeball tomorrow. Frankly, I'm all for it. I can't say I was ever actually that into real dodgeball but the video game Super Dodge Ball (or, as I like to call it, real dodgeball) for the NES was my favorite game as a kid/awkward teen.
I don't even know where or how we acquired Super Dodge Ball. All I know is that by the time I was 14 I was pretty much unbeatable. Mostly that was because by 14 my friends were too busy buying cologne and getting in fist fights after school to actually play me, but it wouldn't have mattered.
The premise of the game is simple. Your dodgeball team travels around the world to play teams of ethnic stereotypes in crude approximations of the countries they come from. For instance, in China, you play in front of a picture of Mao. In Kenya, you play on dirt. For the better part of my life, I assumed that the people in Iceland actually did live on large sheets of abnormally slick ice thanks to this game. After you beat all of the insensitive caricatures, you have to face a sub-human, undoubtedly cheating team from the U.S.S.R.
Even though communism had more or less collapsed by the time I played this game, it certainly didn't diminish my thrill every time I beat Boris (the Soviet's best player, naturally) and his gang of Politburo-backed hoods. I imagine this is how Ronald Reagan felt all the time.
Anyway, assuming what I did in a 20-year-old video game is applicable in the real world--and honestly, why not assume that--I should be both amazing at dodgeball and have unusually shiny hair tomorrow.
By
Anonymous
|
0
comments
2.26.2008
Exhibit 7.12
I feel like I need something new at the top of this blog before everyone falls in love with Scott Kleeb.
I thought about posting a picture of Jeremy Roenick, but that would just be strange. Well, too late now:
Nobody loves that.
By
Anonymous
|
0
comments
2.25.2008
Exhibit 7.11
For Nebraskans

By
Anonymous
|
1 comments
2.23.2008
Exhibit 7.10
Great lines from the movie we saw last night:
"POTUS is in hand."
"He’s gone rogue!"
Yep, The Diving Bell and the Butterfly was one fantastic movie.
By
Anonymous
|
1 comments
Cross-reference: Gone Rogue& Hands& Movies
2.22.2008
Exhibit 7.9
I realized I had an error in my pointless numbering system. This issue has been corrected.
By
Anonymous
|
0
comments
Cross-reference: Challenges& Changes& Systems
2.21.2008
Exhibit 7.8
Rocket Science
We watched the movie the other night. It was good. Not amazing or transcendent or anything, but just a good movie that wore a lot of its references on its sleeve yet was actively trying to defy expectations of where the narrative was headed. It also caused me to listen to that first Violent Femmes album again, so that's a plus. By the way, that album is more than 25 years old.
Albums that came out a month before Violent Femmes:
- Prince*, 1999
- Marvin Gaye, Midnight Love
- The Smiths, The Smiths
- Talking Heads, Speaking in Tongues
- Prince, Purple Rain
- Tom Waits, Swordfishtrombones
- Willie Nelson/Merle Haggard, Pancho and Lefty
- The Police, Synchronicity
- Kelly Clarkson, Breakaway
Albums that came out on the same day as Violent Femmes:
- Michael Jackson, Thriller
I don't know, maybe this isn't shocking information if you were around to experience them at the time, but it seems wrong somehow. Just be glad I'm giving you this information now rather than betting you at a bar that Violent Femmes was released before Purple Rain**.
Anyway, I actually wanted to post about this type of rocket science. Did anyone actually think they were going to be able to hit it? You won this round, military-industrial complex. I'd like to think a chant of USA! USA! broke out immediately afterward, but this was in Houston, so that was probably already happening***.
*By the way, when you search for Prince on Wikipedia, it takes you to an article on the monarch and not the artist. We need to fix this fast before Prince finds out.
**I wouldn't do this.
***I've never been to Houston.
By
Anonymous
|
0
comments
Cross-reference: Movies& Music& Types of Rocket Science
2.18.2008
Exhibit 7.7
Stock Photography Review
One of the most common ways to utilize stock photography is as a stand in for a company's sickly, jaundiced employees. While low wages, poor working conditions, and fluorescent lights might make already unattractive employees appear malnourished and unhelpful, the timely use of a stock photo can let the public think a company's workers are clean, moderately attractive people versed in the use of a floral kerchief:
Now that's an employee you expect to answer the phone at your cable company. She may not have a computer, but she has a series of indistinguishable white binders full of answers. She hasn't yet mastered watch-to-kerchief coordination, she does have a pleasantly theatrical way of posing while talking.
The important thing is to find a photo that screams competence when you put a picture on your contact page.
Headsets: Check.
Diversity: Check.
Business formal attire: Check.
Phones:
Oh, so close. On the plus side, the lady on the left looks like she's terrified of having to answer any questions anyway. Somebody should get her some helpful white binders.
As this person clearly has no idea how to hook up a computer, it's probably best to avoid this photo. While the mouse and cpu-less keyboard with its monitor set up perpendicular to the keyboard may look high-tech, it's probably not going to lead to effective, accurate answers.
Rather than who will be answering, stock photography can also be used to portray those who will be calling. The picture you choose will say a lot about your company.
This one says: We're perverts.
This one says: We're perverts.
By
Anonymous
|
0
comments
Cross-reference: Floral& Kerchiefs& Stock Photography
2.15.2008
Exhibit 7.6
This was my Valentine's Day present from Heather. I've been wanting this poster for a long time. Needless to say, it's awesome. Actual conversation between Heather and the woman at Hobby Lobby when it was picked up after having been framed.
Woman: Ugh, who'd want a picture of Elliott Gould?
Heather: My boyfriend. It's for Valentine's Day.
Woman: Oh, and it says bullet. Who'd want that for Valentine's Day?
Heather:
Woman:
Heather:
Woman: Well, I guess it's too late now.
This is what I got for Heather:
There was a necklace too. Still, I totally lost this holiday. I mean, I know that's not how a person should think about it, but it's true. I lost big.
By
Anonymous
|
1 comments
2.14.2008
Exhibit 7.5
An announcement from The Cupboard:
The Cupboard would like to apologize for the lack of pamphleteering we’ve done recently. As always, The Cupboard has excuses and plans.
Since we began, we’ve being trying to find ways to deal with the problematic business of publishing a monthly anonymous online and in-print literary pamphlet. Unfortunately, while we’re proud of everything we’ve printed, getting the quality of submissions The Cupboard hopes to print has been difficult. Perhaps not surprisingly, anonymity is a deal breaker for many writers and while most journals are awash in submissions, we get shockingly few.
So we’re going to change. The Cupboard will still be a pamphlet, only of much greater quality and design than the current model. No longer will we be anonymous, but will instead feature a single author of prose each volume. You might even call these new, nicely printed, single author pamphlets chapbooks. We won’t—The Cupboard is a pamphlet—but you might.
Longer and greater announcements are forthcoming, but just know that The Cupboard will continue. We hope you’ll consider submitting and subscribing once everything is settled. We’ll be in touch.
Warmly,
The Cupboard
By
Anonymous
|
2
comments
Cross-reference: Changes& Pamphlets& The Cupboard
2.13.2008
Exhibit 7.4
By
Anonymous
|
0
comments
Exhibit 7.3
Pitchers and catchers report for spring training today. In honor, some baseball links:
*Here is a blog dedicated to featuring each baseball card from the 1988 Topps Set. This was one of my favorite sets as a kid. I think I had about two dozen of the Kevin Seitzers from this set. For the record, he's number 275. I can barely wait.
*This is K.C. Star columnist Joe Posnanski's blog which is pretty much essential reading whether you like sports or not.
*Baseball Genius/Doctor/Royals Fan Rany Jazayerli has just started a Royals blog. His first post spells out his qualifications if you're not familiar. Needless to say, the fact that the Royals have some of the best baseball minds as fans/locals (Rany, Bill James, Rob Neyer) and the best sports columnist in America writing about them (Pos) makes them by far the most spoiled of any team that hasn't reached the playoffs in over 20 years.
By
Anonymous
|
0
comments
2.11.2008
Exhibit 7.2
I have a short story in the new issue of CutBank which you can learn all about here. It also features work by Tomaz Salamun, Matt Hart, Dennis McFadden, and many others. Plus, cool silhouette art by Andy Smetanka. I haven't had a chance to read it all yet, but so far it's fantastic.
By
Anonymous
|
0
comments
2.07.2008
Exhibit 7.1
On Editing a Novel #4
TURNING YOUR NOVEL INTO A LEGAL THRILLER. It's probably become clear that the painstaking fictionalization of your adolescence isn't nearly as emotionally tortured as you hoped. If publishing your novel is less important to you than accurately describing your junior prom, you should skip to step #18 'ACQUIRING THE PUBLISHING RIGHTS TO TOAD THE WET SPROCKET SONGS'.
If you are interested in seeing your novel published, it is probably time to turn it into a legal thriller.
First you'll need a plaintiff. And then a defendant. It's not important that you know the difference, only that you make one of them someone big and evil while the other is small and scrappy. This is best done by making the bad guy literally three or four times as big as the good guy so that there is no confusion. The judge should still be normal sized.
To complete the transition, simply do a find and replace for the following phrases:
Tea Biscuits -> Legal Briefs
No -> I object
"I want to tell you something." -> "If it pleases the court."
Stabs -> Files
"You can handle the truth." -> "You can't handle the truth."
Her -> Habeas Corpus
Home -> All the Way to the Top
"I need you." -> "We need to find McMurphy!"
Prison -> Law School
Love -> Jurisprudence
Now your sentimental tripe is a daring legal thriller.
By
Anonymous
|
0
comments
